IS THERE A "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE VACCINE" TO PREVENT COVID?
COVID VACCINE: SAFE OR NOT?
The FDA has issued an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for the COVID vaccines, but has not yet approved them as safe or effective. Many people do not realize that neither the Pfizer nor the Moderna vaccines prevent infection from COVID-19. They only lessen symptoms, kind of like that green syrup some people take before bed when they have a really bad cold. It doesn't make the cold go away, it just reduces the symptoms so you can sleep. So even if you take the vaccine, you can still get sick, and spread COVID-19 to others.
The idea behind this new approach is that the mRNA injection causes your own cells to produce the COVID-19 spike protein with the hopes that your immune system will learn to recognize and attack the COVID virus if it ever enters your body as it now recognizes the spike protein. It's a great idea in theory, but it's only gone through an incredibly short 3-month trial, so no one knows the long term side effects. Typically vaccines take several years to develop and test before being brought to market. Is it reasonable to take that risk, considering that more than 99.9% of the public are at no risk of death from COVID-19?
THE VACCINE ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM (VAERS)
VAERS is the government-operated Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Since the advent of the new 'vaccines', VAERS has seen a massive uptick in reported adverse 'vaccine' reactions. As of June 4, 2021 there have been 329,021 adverse events connected to the 'vaccines', of which 5,888 resulted in death. This death statistic is greater than the previous twenty years combined of reported deaths from vaccination to VAERS.
These data can be found by searching the VAERS database for COVID-19 reports at:
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
or
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) (hhs.gov)
A recent study has come out which verifies the accuracy of VAERS data. It statistically confirms the adverse reactions and deaths reported to VAERS must be a result of the Covid-19 injections (pdf):
THE 'VACCINES' ARE NOT APPROVED BY THE FDA! THEY HAVE MERELY BEEN GRANTED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION
One of the many errors that drop from the mouths of robotic TV 'experts' is that these new 'vaccines' are FDA approved. A simple perusal of the FDA documents easily disproves this. For example, page one of the Pfizer FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) documentation states, "The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19." These documents likewise acknowledge that the clinical trials are ongoing. Therefore, both the short- and long-term consequences of the shots are unknown; as such the shots represent an experiment being conducted on all who participate. See for yourself! You can download the FDA EUA documentation (pdf) for each injection below!
THE SPIKE PROTEIN IS DANGEROUS!
The injected mRNA (or DNA, in the case of the Johnson & Johnson shot) instructs your body's cells to create the spike protein, the most pernicious constituent of the Covid-19-causing SARS-CoV-2 virus. Several peer-reviewed studies have examined the detrimental effects the spike protein inflicts on various systems of human biology. See the linked pdfs of these studies below. Consider the facts carefully before allowing these risky injections to create abundant amounts of this toxic protein in your body!
The injected mRNA (or DNA, in the case of the Johnson & Johnson shot) instructs your body's cells to create the spike protein, the most pernicious constituent of the Covid-19-causing SARS-CoV-2 virus. Several peer-reviewed studies have examined the detrimental effects the spike protein inflicts on various systems of human biology. See the linked pdfs of these studies below. Consider the facts carefully before allowing these risky injections to create abundant amounts of this toxic protein in your body!
The spike protein weakens the blood-brain barrier and can cause brain endothelial cell inflammation:
The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice
The spike protein can cause blood clotting and thrombsis:
SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19
The spike protein causes abnormal cell signaling with pathological consequences:
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE2
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-mediated cell signaling in lung vascular cells
The spike protein shares enough similarity to human proteins that it may induce autoimmune disorders:
The spike protein may interact with tumor suppressor proteins:
S2 Subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 Interacts with Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 and BRCA: an In Silico Study
The mRNA for the spike protein contains sequences known to induce prion disease configuration in some proteins:
COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
The spike protein is a prion protein and interacts with several other prion proteins responsible for a number of neurodegenerative disorders; it is possible the spike protein can accelerate neurodegeneration:
SARS-CoV-2 prion-like domains in spike proteins enable higher affinity to ACE2
The spike protein receptor, ACE2, is highly expressed in testes. Therefore, 'vaccine' spike protein signaling in the testes may have dire consequences on male fertility:
BREAKTHROUGH CASES ARE COMMONPLACE
A common misconception about the new injections is that they protect their recipients from future SARS-CoV-2 infection. This is not the case. In fact, stopping infection is not a required outcome of the ongoing clinical trials. That's why the CDC is currently tracking cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst the fully vaccinated - called 'breakthrough cases'. As of April 26, 2021, 9,245 breakthrough Covid-19 cases have been identified, including 835 hospitalizations and 132 deaths. Interestingly, as of May 14, 2021, the CDC will only be reporting breakthrough infections where the patient was hospitalized or died, in order to "maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance." They certainly were not worried about case data quality throughout the course of the 'pandemic’.
This information can be found at:
COVID-19 Breakthrough Case Investigations and Reporting | CDC
Interestingly, the RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) limit used to determine a breakthrough case has changed from what has been routinely used to discern a 'case of Covid-19' throughout the 'pandemic'. The Ct limit is 28 for breakthrough cases whereas it has typically been set between 40 and 45 (depending on the test kit) for the last year plus.
Compare page one (pdf):
COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation
To page thirty six (pdf):
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
Higher cycle threshold limits create much higher false positive prevalence and are more often than not detecting dead virus. Linked below is a short study (pdf) demonstrating this. We are being conned.
'VACCINATION' ABSOLUTE RISK REDUCTION IS NEGLIGIBLE
An assessment of the reported efficacy of the novel injections calls into question the methods used to determine efficacy data. This study posits that the absolute risk reduction (of contracting severe Covid-19) conferred by the shots is significantly less than the efficacies reported by the companies creating them: 1.2% for the Moderna and 0.84% for the Pfizer shot. Another revealing statistic is the number needed to vaccinate to prevent 1 case, asymptomatic or otherwise, of Covid-19: 81 for the Moderna and 119 for the Pfizer injection. See for yourself! (pdf):
COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room
Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials
UNPRECEDENTED VACCINES
A 2018 report was published in Gates Open Research, a Bill and Melinda Gates foundation-sponsored journal, which addressed the need for more attention to neglected diseases. Unsurprisingly, new vaccines were among the products proposed to address neglected diseases. Three categories of vaccinations were discussed: simple, complex, and unprecedented. Vaccines employing a novel approach (mRNA) and/or are the first attempts at inoculations against a particular disease (Covid-19) qualify as unprecedented. This study reveals unprecedented vaccines take an average of 13 years to reach market and have less than a 1% chance of making it all the way through phase III trials. Shockingly (or not) each of the Moderna/Pfizer/J&J shots made it all the way to market in less than 1 year despite being unprecedented injections. What does this mean? Decide for yourself! pdf:
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL
The lipid nanoparticle (LNP) that protects and shepherds the Covid-19 'vaccine' mRNA into cells also serves another function: it is an adjuvant to stimulate an immune response. A recent study confirmed the LNP is effective at this latter purpose and described it as "highly inflammatory" (pdf):
One of the main components of the LNP is polyethylene glycol (PEG). This substance is a known allergen linked to severe anaphylaxis (pdfs):
Polyethylene glycol as a cause of anaphylaxis
Polyethylene Glycol-Induced Systemic Allergic Reactions (Anaphylaxis)
As this allergen is used in a number of skin creams, toothpastes, personal lubricants, and as an anti-foaming food additive, PEG antibodies have been discovered in a significant portion of the population (pdfs):
Antibodies against polyethylene glycol in human blood: A literature review
Further, the presence of these antibodies against PEG has been demonstrated to exacerbate PEG-induced allergic reactions (pdfs):
Anti-PEG IgE in anaphylaxis associated with polyethylene glycol
One has to question the motivation behind using this molecule in the Covid shots, particularly in light of the overwhelming amount of evidence on this page that these injections are highly toxic.
Below you will find links to several excellent interviews by scientists who are willing to tell the truth about COVID
INTERVIEW WITH DR. MICHAEL YEADON
Dr. Michael Yeadon is the former/retired Vice President and Chief Scientist for allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer Pharmaceutical. In this interview, he brings 43 years of experience to analyze what is really going on with the COVID-19 vaccine, and all the various components of the COVID response.
Highly Qualified Vaccine Expert Warns Of Vaccine Disaster & It MUST Be Stopped!
Dr Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD a pro-vaccine expert says vaccine will cause disaster on a scale we have never seen before due to the fact it is the wrong type of vaccine to be giving to millions of people in the midst of a pandemic.
IS THERE A "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE VACCINE" TO PREVENT COVID?
Dr. Judy Mikovitz is the author of the best selling book Plague of Corruption. Below she is interviewed by Dr. Joseph Mercola about the COVID 'vaccine' and explains what you need to know, but will never hear in the news. This interview is a "must see" if you want to protect yourself and your loved ones.
WHAT TO DO ABOUT THE VACCINE?
Perhaps the first question we should be asking is: do we need a COVID vaccine? Traditionally, vaccines are created to prevent diseases for which there is no known treatment. If a particular disease is incurable, causes permanent injury or death, and there are no effective therapeutics to treat it, and if that disease poses a grave risk to a significant portion of the population, then developing a safe and effective vaccine makes a lot of sense. Clearly, this is not the case for COVID-19. Between 99.91% and 99.99993% of people who contract COVID-19 survive, with little to no permenant injury. And since every person is unique, no vaccine is safe and effective for everyone. There is a risk, however slight, with every vaccine. So the risk created by the vaccine must always be weighed against the risk in not taking the vaccine. In the first 30 days that the new COVID vaccine was injected into healthy people, VAERS (the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) recieved reports of over 40,ooo adverse events, including 3,100 cases of anaphylactic shock, and 5,000 neurological reactions. It is currently estimated that only 1% to 10% of all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS, so the actual number of adverse events, including death, are much higher. According to VAERS, as of April 30, 2021 there have been 157,277 adverse events connected to the vaccine, and 3,837 of those events resulted in death.
But what if therapeutics are available? What if the disease in question can be easily treated using medicines that have been tried and tested already? Every vaccine contains toxins called adjuvants. The purpose of the toxins is to stimulate your body's immune system to notice and develop a strategy for fighting off the invading pathogen, which is present in the vaccine, in a weakened state. If the vaccine contained a strong pathogen, it would most likely make you sick. But if the pathogen in the vaccine is too weak, your immune system would not perceive it as a threat and would just ignore it. So vaccine manufacturers put toxins (mercury, aluminum, etc.) into the vaccine to get the attention of your immune system. The goal is to get your immune system to associate the toxins with the weakened pathogen and stimulate your immune system to develop a defense against the pathogen. So, the next time it sees that particular disease, it will know how to attack it. That's the idea anyway. The risk comes from the fact that these toxins (adjuvants) are, well... toxic. Injecting toxic substances into a healthy person creates risk. It's part of why ALL vaccines come with some degree of risk. BUT if a treatment for the disease is readily available, affordable, and less risky, why develop a vaccine for that particular disease in the first place? Doesn't it make more sense to leave healthy people alone and not treat them at all unless they become sick?
There are currently at least three reliable medications that have been demonstrated in countless patients to be effective treatments for COVID-19: Budesonide, Ivermectin, and Hydroxychloroquine. Unfortunately, many doctors are unaware of the effectiveness of these drugs for treating COVID-19. Even worse, some doctors have been threatened that if they use hydroxychloroquine, there will be unpleasant consequences for that doctor. That's not the way medicine is supposed to work. Doctors should be informed of other doctors' successes and be allowed to make their own decisions about the best way to treat their patients, without state or federal agencies telling them they cannot use available prescription medications that have already undergone proper safety testing. Those decisions should be left to the doctors and their patients.
2021 JAN 27 Dr. Tenpenny explains how COVID vaccines depopulation will start working in 3-6 months
Doctors Speak Out!