(NaturalNews) The vaccine establishment has a horrible conundrum. It desperately wants everyone to voluntarily buy its for-profit vaccine products, but it has failed to convince everyone that its products are safe and effective... or even necessary in many cases.
The problem is made even worse by the fact that the products themselves really aren't as safe and effective as we've all been told. Flu shots still contain mercury, a neurotoxic heavy metal. Some vaccine inserts still admit they are backed by no clinical trials. The U.S. government really has quietly paid out nearly $3 billion in compensation awards to families of children who were irrefutably damaged by vaccines. A top CDC scientist really did confess to taking part in scientific fraud at the CDC, covering up data linking vaccines to autism.
These facts are irrefutable. So the strategy of the vaccine industry -- and its obedient media fanatics who have utterly forgotten what it means to ask an intelligent question -- has been to withhold this information from patients.
The thinking is that if patients can be isolated from the truth that vaccines aren't as safe and effective as they've been told, then they might be easily manipulated into buying them. Above all, withholding accurate information from the public would at the very least prevent people from asking uncomfortable questions about vaccines... questions that might lead to catastrophic disclosures for the vaccine industry (such as scientists testifying before Congress about research fraud).
Under the iron fist of corporate-run vaccine fanaticism, the questioning of medical dogma cannot be allowed. So the strategy remains one of "reality control" by attempting to aggressively manipulate all the information the public sees and hears about vaccines in order to construct a false reality that only the more illiterate members of public really believe.
A blatant violation of A.M.A. code of ethics
This very tactic is, according to the American Medical Association, a gross violation of fundamental medical ethics.
"Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor," the A.M.A. says on its Code of Ethics page.
This statement is also found in the AMA's published book, Code of Medical Ethics, on the bottom half of page 269.
It goes on to explain:
The patient's right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient's care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice.
The vaccine industry, however, cannot achieve obedient compliance if it allows patients to be fully informed. Informed consent, it turns out, is the enemy of vaccine propaganda which stands as the world's most outrageous example of distorted, one-sided medical propaganda waged as a psychological warfare operation against the American people.
Even though denying patients access to important information about risks vs. benefits of vaccines is a fundamental violation of patients' rights, virtually the entire medical profession does it anyway. Vaccine insert sheets containing disclosure language -- side effects, vaccine ingredients, contraindications, etc. -- are almost never given to vaccine recipients. Doctors who are given airtime on television never talk about any vaccine risks whatsoever, even though such risks are quite real.
The pharma-corrupted medical profession in America today, it turns out, has become very comfortable with knowingly lying by omission. This has become an accepted practice even though it clearly violates the American Medical Association's own code of ethics.
When lying doesn't work, coercion becomes the next desperate tactic of an institution that respects no ethics or boundaries whatsoever
Unfortunately for the vaccine industry, even lying through omission has not achieved the desired effect. Frustratingly for the industry, many parents are learning the truth about vaccine risks, vaccine ingredients, vaccine side effects and vaccine injuries through non-official sources which cannot be controlled by corporations and governments, such as www.Vactruth.com www.VaccineImpact.com www.TheRefusers.comwww.FearlessParent.org and many more.
As a result of being informed from non-corporate-controlled sources, more and more parents are making actual informed decisions about vaccines which often lead to either the delay of vaccination schedules or the rejection of some vaccines outright.
This angers the vaccine industry to no end. They cannot understand why medical sheeple who have been aggressively brainwashed, lied to, manipulated and defrauded still have the will to resist the Big Lie of "safe and effective vaccines." Vaccine manufacturers have desperately tried to discredit all the "anti-vaxxer" voices by deploying expensive negative P.R. troll companies, but there are just too many voices of truth to silence (and the negative P.R. often backfires).
Even worse, the more vaccines are pushed, the more vaccine-damaged children emerge, and even parents who have been repeatedly brainwashed, indoctrinated, intimidated and misdirected by the sellout national media aren't so stupid that they can't see when their children are severely harmed following vaccinations.
So, predictably, the vaccine institution is now resorting to its last option. The "nuclear option," you might say: Coercion.
Coercion
Coercion means forcing you to undergo a medical intervention against your will. This is, by definition, the very nature of all mandatory vaccination programs.
Medicine by coercion is not merely a gross violation of the American Medical Association's published code of ethics, it's also a violation of the Geneva Convention.
Article 7 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, signed into agreement by the United Nations, states, "[N]o one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation."
Every flu shot is, of course, a medical experiment
. They are not tested in clinical trials before being released to the public. That's precisely why many flu shots completely miss the mark and fail to provide protection against the actual viral strains of the flu circulating in the wild.
Forcing someone to get a flu shot against their will is an international crime under the Geneva Convention as well as a violation of medical ethics, established federal law and basic human dignity. Yet it is being loudly and fanatically called for by the entire mainstream media and whatever doctors they can round up who will promote the Big Lie during live news broadcasts. Those news broadcasts are always and predictably biased wholly in favor of vaccine propaganda while ludicrously blaming anti-vaxxers for the failures of the vaccines themselves.
The fact that these medical experiments and forced medical interventions violate human rights, international law, domestic law and medical ethical codes does not bother anyone pushing vaccines today. The very idea of "medical ethics" doesn't even cross their minds. Ethics are not necessary, they imply, when justifying mass mandatory vaccination campaigns that are claimed to be conducted in the public good.
A medical profession that abandons ethics in one area can never be trusted in any area
Through this logic, the medical profession can justify any actions it wants and abandon all ethics in the name of "public good." Any public health problem at all -- tuberculosis, the flu, etc. -- can be wildly exaggerated by the media and made into a scare campaign that justifies the medical profession's outright abandonment of medical ethics. If the government needs to force you to do something medical -- even at gunpoint, against your will -- it's okay with all the doctors because they believe the government owns your body.
Of course, Ebola is the big exception to all this. No one who might be infected with Ebola can ever be quarantined, the CDC and White House vigorously argued a few months ago, because that might "violate their medical freedom." So Nurse Hickox, a former CDC intelligence operative, was allowed to go free even though she had a high likelihood of carrying a deadly disease with no vaccine at all: Ebola.
But children in America who carry no disease at all must be strictly quarantined, denied a public education, denied doctor visits and often seized by the state, even when they aren't infected with anything. That's the new logic of the medical profession in America, where logic and rationality have now been utterly replaced by screaming, the verbal abuse of patients and the ludicrous name-calling of "anti-vaxxers" who are ridiculously and repeatedly accused of somehow believing the Earth is flat.
These are the desperate tactics of an industry that has lost the propaganda war. When the censorship fails, the propaganda fails and the disinfo fails, they now resort to coercion, public shaming of innocent victims and wild name-calling under the banner of "science!"
A.M.A. says withholding information will undermine "public trust in the health care profession"
The American Medical Association is fully aware that lying to patients in order to demand their vaccine obedience only destroys public trust in the entire medical profession. And it should. The tactics used by doctors today are despicable, if not outright criminal violations of international law as discussed above.
In a document the A.M.A. warns cannot be cited by anyone without "written permission from the A.M.A.", the organization warns about the disastrous consequences of the medical profession losing the public trust:
Withholding pertinent medical information from patients without their knowledge or consent may also have negative long-term consequences for the medical profession. The patient-physician relationship is founded upon trust, because patients must rely upon their physicians to provide the information needed to make a properly informed decision. Lack of candid disclosure can compromise this relationship if patients suspect (or later discover) that information is being withheld from them. Thus, individual physicians' purportedly benevolent acts of deception risk undermining not only individuals, but also public confidence and trust in the medical profession.
Thus, while the massive media propaganda campaign is supposed to be targeting only "anti-vaxxers" and intimidating them into getting vaccines, what it's really doing is sowing widespread distrust in the medical profession among the public at large.
After all, even people who agree with vaccine fanatics are also smart enough to realize the following: If we allow the government to force this intervention on us all, what happens when the government rolls out another intervention that we disagree with?
The very idea of handing the government-medical fascism establishment total control over your medical choice is troubling... even to those who voluntary agree to be vaccinated. After all, the entire "Pro Choice" argument of abortion advocates is built on the foundation that a woman owns her own body and can therefore decide what to do with it.
Astonishingly, it is largely the pro-choice people on the left who are the most fanatical about vaccine mandates, proving that they really don't believe in "choice" in the first place. They believe in abortion, not medical choice. Because when a mom's medical choice is anti-vaccine, suddenly the abortion supporters are calling for the government to take control of that woman's body (or the bodies of her children) and force them all to be injected against their will.
So much for "choice."
As even the rabidly pro-vaccine Washington Post now points out, all this vaccine screaming by the mainstream media "...also decreased trust in doctors. This suggests a very troubling implication: media coverage of the controversy about the measles vaccine could actually affect the general public beyond the very small anti-vax community."
In other words, what's really happening is that media coverage on vaccines is causing many people who never questioned vaccines to start wondering about vaccines from a new perspective. Mainstream media vaccine coverage also drives enormous traffic to alternative news sites covering the vaccine hysteria, whereas if vaccine weren't being mentioned in the mainstream media, most people wouldn't be paying any attention to the topic at all.
Truly, the more the mainstream media talks about vaccines, the more they cause people to question the "official" propaganda.
It's all BACKFIRING, in other words.
As Dr. Wakefield recently explained in an interview with Alex Jones:
If you have a vaccination policy in this country which mandates, which takes your children away, which puts you at gunpoint, which puts parents in prison for not vaccinating, that is not built upon public trust or confidence; that is a disaster. And public health policy, vaccination policy, requires the confidence of the public, and they have lost it.
They have lost it, indeed. More and more people are losing trust in the criminally run pharma medical establishment every single day. All the bribery of doctors, science research fraud, vaccine hysteria, cancer industry lies and pharmaceutical malfeasance keeps coming out, it seems, and people are becoming exceedingly aware that nearly everything Big Pharma and the CDC tells us is a flat-out lie.
How do you know when the CDC is lying? When their lips are moving, the saying goes. And nobody hammers the CDC against the wall better than Jon Rappoport at www.NoMoreFakeNews.com
It's a simple concept: Any medicine that worked so well would never have to be administered at gunpoint
The simple truth of the matter is that the more the mainstream media tries to intimidate and coerce the public into giving up their medical freedom and surrendering their fundamental human right of free choice, the more the People lose trust in both the media and the medical profession.
After all, if vaccines are really so great and safe and effective, they wouldn't have to be administered at gunpoint, would they?
Once medicine marches down the path of claiming it alone has the authority to decide what medical interventions must be forced upon your body, it has already lost the public trust.
As Dr. Wakefield further explains in the video interview linked above:
This is a do-or-die moment. It's absolutely crucial in the history of this country and, indeed, the world, of who prevails. Who do your children actually belong to? And if we do not get William Thompson before a congressional series of committees, that unearth the precise nature and extent of the fraud at the CDC... if we do not do that, and if we lose this battle, your children, you, will be owned by the pharmaceutical industry, and your children and your children's children. And they are simply a marketplace for those companies. They are quantified in terms of vaccination for every birth and how much revenue they will generate for the pharmaceutical industry in a mandated program for which there is no real recourse to any kind of compensational litigation if your children are harmed.
So they want to take away your rights as to whether your children should be vaccinated or not according to your decision, but if your child is harmed -- and vaccines are, according to the Supreme Court, "unavoidably unsafe" -- then you are left to pick up the pieces. And that is the system that we face, and at the end of it is a massive profit for the pharmaceutical industry.